top of page

The Implications of Qualified Immunity on the Struggle for Civil Rights

Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that shields government officials, including police officers, from being held personally liable for actions taken in the course of their duties. The doctrine was established by the Supreme Court in 1967, and has been applied in a wide range of cases since then.

partial view of U.S. Supreme Court exterior

While qualified immunity was intended to protect government officials from frivolous lawsuits, it has also been criticized for making it difficult to hold officials accountable for civil rights violations. In recent years, there has been growing concern about the impact of qualified immunity on the struggle for civil rights and social justice.

One of the key implications of qualified immunity is that it can make it difficult for individuals to hold police officers accountable for civil rights violations. For example, in cases where an officer uses excessive force, it can be difficult to establish that the officer violated a "clearly established" constitutional right, which is required to overcome qualified immunity.

This can create a situation where police officers are effectively immune from civil liability for actions that may be unconstitutional or in violation of civil rights. In some cases, this has led to a lack of accountability and a sense of impunity among some police officers, which can erode public trust and undermine efforts to promote greater equality and social justice.